
Image Source: pexels
The credit card usage situation in Morocco reveals a core contradiction. Despite the growing digital payment market, data shows that between 2017 and 2021, the proportion of credit card holders was only 1.05%. For users holding locally issued cards, a common reality is strict restrictions on international payments.
These restrictions directly create practical barriers for cross-border e-commerce shopping, digital service subscriptions, and personal remittances, forming a significant gap between modern payment demands and local financial policies.

Image Source: unsplash
A deeper analysis of credit card usage in Morocco reveals a complex market shaped by traditional habits and modern policies. While digital payments are on the rise, the overall payment landscape still exhibits distinct local characteristics.
Morocco’s payment habits are rooted in a cash-based culture. Data shows that cash payments dominate daily transactions, primarily because a portion of the adult population lacks bank accounts and culturally prefers using cash.
Credit card penetration remains relatively low. As of 2021, the proportion of adults with credit cards is small, reflecting limited penetration in the local market.
| Metric | Value | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of population with credit cards | 1.05% | 2021 |
Among existing card users, international brands dominate. Visa and Mastercard are the main players in the market, while local payment solutions hold a smaller share.
For tourists and expatriates visiting Morocco, using international credit cards is quite convenient. Merchants, hotels, and ATMs in major cities widely accept Visa and Mastercard. This provides tourists with the best exchange rate options, often more cost-effective than cash exchange.
However, a common phenomenon is worth noting: even if merchants display Visa or Mastercard logos, they may sometimes claim the card machine is “broken” to avoid transaction fees. Therefore, carrying backup cash is a prudent practice.
For Moroccan residents holding cards issued by local banks, the situation is entirely different. While these cards are convenient for domestic use, they face strict restrictions when used for international payments.
The core restriction on international spending for local residents lies in a foreign exchange control policy called “Dotation Touristique.” This policy sets an annual foreign exchange limit for each citizen for international travel and online payments. This policy directly impacts credit card usage in Morocco, particularly for cross-border transactions.
The specific annual quota regulations are as follows:
This policy aims to manage the country’s foreign exchange reserves but also creates a direct barrier for local users using credit cards for overseas shopping or subscribing to international services.
The annual foreign exchange quota policy directly results in significant challenges for local residents making international online payments. This restriction isolates Moroccan consumers from the global digital market, making both physical goods purchases and virtual service subscriptions complex and uncertain. The complex credit card usage situation in Morocco is the root of these challenges.
For Moroccan consumers hoping to shop on international e-commerce platforms (such as Amazon, AliExpress, or European fashion websites), the annual foreign exchange quota is a significant obstacle.
When consumers make cross-border transactions, the banking system automatically deducts the corresponding amount from their annual quota. Once the quota is exhausted, all subsequent international payment requests are rejected. This creates significant uncertainty for the shopping experience.
Imagine a scenario: a consumer spends about 9,000 USD on electronics and clothing in the first half of the year. When they try to purchase a 1,500 USD laptop during the year-end sales season, the transaction may fail because it exceeds the basic annual quota of 100,000 Dirhams (approximately 10,000 USD).
This restriction forces consumers to carefully plan their international spending throughout the year, unable to shop online as freely as consumers in other countries.
The challenges are not limited to one-time large purchases but also affect increasingly popular digital service subscriptions. Many globally popular services operate on a monthly or annual subscription model, posing ongoing difficulties for Moroccan users.
These services include:
While individual subscription fees are not high, these recurring payments continuously consume the user’s annual foreign exchange quota. A user may successfully subscribe at the beginning of the year, but in a certain month mid-year, the service may suddenly stop due to payment failure, simply because their annual quota has been exhausted.
Faced with the payment barriers of local credit cards, consumers naturally seek alternative solutions. However, these alternatives also come with their own limitations.
PayPal is a globally recognized online payment tool, but its ecosystem in Morocco is not fully integrated. PayPal services in Morocco are restricted, directly affecting the convenience of international transactions through the platform, such as the inability to fully utilize all card functions provided by PayPal.
Some local banks attempt to offer prepaid international payment cards as a solution, but these cards are also subject to the same national foreign exchange control policies, sharing the same annual spending quota. They merely shift quota management from credit cards to prepaid cards without addressing the fundamental issue.
| Payment Method | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Local Bank Credit Card | Convenient for domestic use | Strictly limited by annual foreign exchange quota, international payments may fail at any time |
| PayPal | Widely accepted globally | Limited functionality in Morocco, not a reliable international payment channel |
| International Prepaid Card | Controlled spending, separate from main account | Also subject to annual foreign exchange quota, requires preloading |
In summary, whether using local credit cards or seeking alternative solutions, Moroccan consumers cannot bypass the core restriction of the annual foreign exchange quota when making international online payments.

Image Source: pexels
The challenges of international payments extend to personal remittances. For Moroccan residents needing to send money to overseas friends or family or receive overseas remittances, credit card restrictions and foreign exchange control policies also pose significant obstacles. This forces people to seek reliable channels outside of credit cards.
Users cannot use credit cards directly for person-to-person cross-border remittances. Credit cards are fundamentally designed for consumption payments for goods and services, not for fund transfers.
The root cause lies in Morocco’s strict foreign exchange control policies. This policy aims to prevent capital outflows and maintain the stability of national foreign exchange reserves. Allowing individuals to freely transfer funds internationally via credit cards would create an unmonitorable gap in capital controls.
Therefore, the banking system directly blocks any attempts to use credit cards for person-to-person (P2P) cross-border transfers. This is not a technical limitation but a fundamental financial regulatory requirement.
Due to the inability to use credit cards for remittances, people turn to traditional professional remittance services. In Morocco, the market is dominated by local giants and international brands. Wafacash, as a leader in the local market, offers great convenience due to its extensive offline branch network.
The following is a comparative analysis of mainstream remittance channels:
| Remittance Service Provider | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Wafacash | Has the densest network of agents in Morocco, making cash withdrawals extremely convenient for recipients; highly trusted by local users. | Relatively limited coverage for international outgoing transfers, with primary advantages in receiving remittances. |
| Western Union | Extensive global network, allowing remittances to Morocco from almost any country; high brand recognition. | Fees and exchange rate spreads are typically high, making overall costs less competitive. |
| MoneyGram | Also has a large global agent network, providing reliable international remittance services. | Similar to Western Union, fees are relatively high, and branch density in Morocco is less than Wafacash. |
For remittances from overseas to Morocco, Western Union and MoneyGram provide global solutions. However, for recipients in Morocco, Wafacash’s local network advantage makes it the most convenient channel for cash withdrawals.
In recent years, emerging remittance tools based on blockchain and digital wallets have gained popularity globally, promising lower fees and faster speeds. However, their adoption in Morocco faces significant localization challenges.
Several factors collectively hinder the widespread use of these digital tools:
These challenges collectively form a high barrier, making emerging remittance tools, despite their technical advantages, difficult to become mainstream choices in the Moroccan market.
Faced with payment and remittance challenges, consumers and businesses are actively seeking solutions. Meanwhile, technological advancements and policy adjustments offer hope for the future. Existing solutions, fintech potential, and policy liberalization collectively shape the future landscape of international payments in Morocco.
For local residents and businesses, the most direct solution is to plan within the existing regulatory framework. Individual users must carefully track their annual foreign exchange quota to avoid payment failures. For businesses with specific needs, some official channels are available.
For example, small tech startups can apply for an annual quota of up to 50,000 USD to pay for international service fees. However, this requires prior government approval, and the process is relatively cumbersome.
For personal remittances, the best way to bypass credit card restrictions is to use professional remittance services like Wafacash. These providers offer legal and reliable fund transfer channels.
Financial technology (FinTech) offers new possibilities for addressing payment challenges. Some Moroccan startups and global companies are actively exploring this field, with the potential to fundamentally improve user experiences.
Additionally, the Central Bank of Morocco (Bank Al-Maghrib) is exploring the possibility of issuing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). The bank has collaborated with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to study the impact of CBDCs on payment systems and has worked with the Central Bank of Egypt to explore its application in cross-border transfers. This suggests the potential for a more efficient and cost-effective official digital remittance channel in the future.
Moroccan policymakers have recognized the limitations imposed by foreign exchange controls. In recent years, the government has taken several measures to gradually ease restrictions, demonstrating a proactive stance toward openness.
In January 2024, the Moroccan Foreign Exchange Office updated rules, increasing allowances for business travel and studies and simplifying the process for import prepayments. While these adjustments are modest, they send a clear signal of reform.
Strong economic drivers support policy liberalization. Morocco has a well-developed banking system and actively encourages foreign investment. To attract foreign capital, the government offers a convertible currency system for foreign investors, ensuring their profits and capital can be freely repatriated. These macroeconomic policies contrast with strict personal foreign exchange controls, creating conditions for further liberalization in the future.
The credit card usage situation in Morocco clearly shows that understanding its unique financial regulations is key. Individuals and businesses must master local policies to successfully manage international payments and remittances.
Key Takeaways Recap
- Card Selection: Tourists should use international credit cards for convenience, while local residents need to be aware of international payment restrictions on local cards.
- Spending Planning: The annual foreign exchange quota directly impacts online shopping, requiring advance planning to avoid transaction failures.
- Remittance Channels: In the context of remittances reaching 104 billion USD in 2022, compliant channels like Wafacash should be chosen instead of relying on credit card transfers.
Tourists should prioritize international credit cards, such as Visa or Mastercard. They are widely accepted at major merchants and ATMs, typically offering better exchange rates than cash conversion. It’s advisable to carry backup cash to handle situations where card payments are not accepted.
Local residents need to carefully plan their annual spending to ensure they do not exceed the annual foreign exchange quota (basic quota of approximately 10,000 USD). For payment needs exceeding the quota, there is currently no simple workaround, and consumption must be managed within the existing regulatory framework.
Credit cards cannot be used for personal remittances. The best option is to use professional remittance services. Wafacash, with its dense network of branches in Morocco, is the most convenient choice for recipients to withdraw cash. Western Union and MoneyGram offer broader global remittance networks.
PayPal’s functionality in Morocco is restricted. Users cannot rely on it as a dependable channel for international payments or remittances. Integration of locally issued cards with PayPal is incomplete, resulting in many international transaction functions being unavailable.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.



