
Image Source: pexels
A high P/E ratio usually means that the stock price is relatively high, while a low P/E ratio may indicate that the stock is relatively cheap.
Understanding the P/E ratio helps investors initially assess valuation levels, but many mistakenly believe that the P/E ratio is the only standard, ignoring factors like earnings growth and capital efficiency.
In practice, the P/E ratio is just a reference tool and should not be the sole basis for investment decisions.

Image Source: pexels
Understanding the P/E ratio begins with grasping its essence.The P/E ratio is the relationship between a company’s stock price and its earnings per share (EPS).
Investors can use the P/E ratio to initially assess a stock’s valuation level.
| Period | Average P/E Ratio | 
|---|---|
| 1870 - 2021 | 15.97x | 
| 1970 - 2021 | 19.79x | 
| 1996 - 2021 | 25.81x | 
| September 2021 | 25x | 
Tip: Judging whether a P/E ratio is high or low cannot be separated from industry, historical data, and market conditions. Simply comparing P/E ratios across different companies can easily lead to misjudgments.
As a valuation tool, the P/E ratio holds an important place in fundamental analysis.
Note: The P/E ratio is only the starting point for valuation analysis and should not be the sole basis for decisions. Investors should combine industry characteristics, company growth potential, and other financial metrics for multidimensional analysis.

Image Source: pexels
The P/E ratio is a key metric for assessing stock valuation.
Understanding the P/E ratio helps investors better grasp the relationship between stock price and company earnings.
The standard P/E ratio formula is as follows:
P/E Ratio = Current Stock Price ÷ Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by subtracting dividends from net income and dividing by the number of shares outstanding.
The table below shows the main components of the P/E ratio calculation:
| Component | Description | 
|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | The ratio of the current stock price to earnings per share (EPS) | 
| Current Stock Price | The company’s current market stock price (in USD) | 
| Earnings Per Share (EPS) | The company’s net income per share, calculated as (Net Income - Dividends) / Shares Outstanding | 
Investors can follow these steps to calculate the P/E ratio:
Calculating the P/E ratio seems simple, but practical errors are common.
Common mistakes by investors include:
Tip: Understanding the P/E ratio involves not only the formula but also combining details from financial reports, industry characteristics, and market conditions to avoid misjudgments due to improper calculation methods.
The trailing P/E ratio is the most common type.
Analysts typically use the previous year’s earnings per share (EPS) as the denominator and the current stock price as the numerator.
The trailing P/E ratio reflects the company’s past profitability and is suitable for assessing companies with stable performance and minimal earnings fluctuations.
Trailing P/E (P/E LYR) uses the previous year’s earnings, is simple to calculate, and facilitates cross-sectional comparisons.
In the U.S. market, investors often use the trailing P/E to compare valuation levels of companies within the same industry. For example, if a tech company had an EPS of $2.5 in 2023 and its current stock price is $50, its trailing P/E is 20x.
The limitation of the trailing P/E is that it cannot reflect future performance changes and is susceptible to one-time gains or losses.
The forward P/E ratio, also known as the leading P/E ratio, emphasizes expectations for future earnings.
The forward P/E is suitable for growth-oriented companies or those with significant earnings fluctuations.
In the U.S., investors analyzing the tech industry often use the forward P/E to assess whether a company’s future valuation is reasonable.
The forward P/E better reflects market confidence in a company’s future development but relies on forecasts that may carry uncertainty.
The P/E TTM (trailing twelve months P/E) combines historical and recent data.
P/E TTM is widely used in the U.S. market, especially for companies with seasonal earnings fluctuations.
Investors use P/E TTM to reflect the company’s latest profitability more promptly, avoiding errors from single-year data.
The table below compares the three P/E types:
| Type | Calculation Basis | Applicable Scenarios | 
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | Previous Year’s EPS | Stable performance companies | 
| Forward P/E | Next 12 Months’ Expected EPS | Growth-oriented or volatile companies | 
| P/E TTM | Past 12 Months’ Actual EPS | Seasonal or recent performance evaluation | 
Investors should select the appropriate P/E type based on the company’s characteristics and industry conditions, combining multidimensional data for comprehensive judgment.
P/E ratios vary significantly across industries.Investors cannot simply compare one company’s P/E ratio with that of another in a different industry.The profitability models and growth rates of industries like technology, finance, and consumer goods differ, leading to varied reasonable P/E ranges.
For example, the semiconductor and software industries typically have higher P/E ratios due to market expectations of future growth.In contrast, industries like automotive manufacturing and insurance have relatively lower P/E ratios, reflecting slower growth or higher earnings stability.
The table below shows the average P/E ratios for select U.S. industries as of September 2025:
| Industry | Average P/E Ratio | 
|---|---|
| Semiconductors | 45.05 | 
| Software - Application | 40.4 | 
| Software - Infrastructure | 33.08 | 
| Automotive Manufacturing | 8.29 | 
| Insurance - Specialty | 11.72 | 
Investors analyzing a U.S.-listed company’s valuation should prioritize comparing its P/E ratio to the industry average.For example, a semiconductor company with a P/E of 50 may seem high compared to the market average but is reasonable relative to the industry’s 45.05 average.Conversely, an automotive company with a P/E above 15 may indicate market expectations of unique profitability or potential overvaluation risks.

Additionally, P/E ratios in some industries fluctuate significantly.The table below compares current, trailing, and forward P/E ratios for major U.S. industries:
| Industry Name | Current P/E | Trailing P/E | Forward P/E | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Advertising | 514.37 | 291.27 | 73.71 | 
| Aerospace/Defense | 39.16 | 87.42 | 35.07 | 
| Auto & Truck | 31.42 | 27.28 | 29.80 | 
| Banks (Large) | 20.06 | 28.04 | 14.03 | 
| Beverage (Soft) | 34.72 | 25.67 | 24.69 | 
| Chemical (Basic) | 15.75 | 25.81 | 14.53 | 

Tip: Understanding the P/E ratio emphasizes that industry comparison is the foundation for judging stock valuation. Investors should avoid direct cross-industry P/E comparisons and prioritize the industry’s historical and current context.
Beyond industry comparisons, historical percentiles are a key tool for judging P/E levels.
Investors can assess whether a stock is overvalued or undervalued by comparing its current P/E ratio to its historical average.
The CAPE ratio (Cyclically Adjusted Price-to-Earnings) is a commonly used method for historical percentile analysis.
The CAPE ratio compares current market prices to the average inflation-adjusted earnings over the past ten years, helping investors identify long-term market valuation levels.
Note: Historical percentile analysis should account for industry cycles and macroeconomic conditions to avoid misjudgments due to short-term fluctuations.
The P/E ratio reflects not only current earnings but also market expectations for future earnings growth.
Investors are often willing to pay a higher P/E for companies with stronger expected growth.
An increase in the P/E ratio often indicates market confidence in the company’s future earnings growth.
Tip: When analyzing the P/E ratio, investors should consider earnings growth expectations and avoid judging a stock as cheap solely based on a low P/E. High-growth companies may still be valuable despite higher P/E ratios.
The price-to-book ratio (P/B ratio) is a commonly used valuation tool for investors.It compares the market’s valuation of a company to its book value as recorded in accounting.
The P/B ratio is suitable for evaluating companies with clear asset structures and reliable book values. For tech and other asset-light industries, the P/B ratio has limited reference value.
The PEG ratio (Price-to-Earnings-to-Growth ratio) offers investors a more dynamic valuation perspective.
A PEG close to 1 is generally considered reasonable. A PEG above 1 may indicate overvaluation, while below 1 may suggest undervaluation, though industry context is key.
No single metric fully reflects a company’s value.Investors typically combine multiple financial ratios (e.g., P/E, PEG, and P/B) to evaluate stock performance from different angles.
| Metric | Focus | Applicable Scenarios | 
|---|---|---|
| P/E | Profitability | Stable or growth-oriented companies | 
| P/B | Asset Value | Asset-intensive industries like banking, insurance | 
| PEG | Growth-Valuation Balance | High-growth or volatile companies | 
Investors should flexibly combine multiple metrics based on company type, industry characteristics, and market conditions to avoid misjudgments from a single perspective.
The P/E ratio heavily relies on earnings per share (EPS), and company earnings are often volatile.
| Company Name | P/E Ratio | Cause of Distortion | 
|---|---|---|
| Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (ICE) | 18 | One-time tax benefits and exceptional items | 
| Colgate-Palmolive (CL) | 25 | Reduced earnings from tax reforms and restructuring costs | 
Investors analyzing the P/E ratio should examine one-time items in financial reports to avoid being misled by short-term earnings fluctuations.
The reasonable range for P/E ratios varies by industry.
For example, the U.S. tech industry commands higher P/E ratios due to strong growth expectations, unlike traditional manufacturing.Cyclical industries like energy and automotive see significant P/E fluctuations influenced by economic cycles, with notable differences between boom and bust periods.
Investors should avoid directly comparing P/E ratios across industries and prioritize the historical and current context of the same industry.
A low P/E ratio does not always mean a stock is undervalued.
Historically, some U.S. department store chains maintained low P/E ratios due to consecutive quarters of declining same-store sales, high debt, weak online presence, low brand loyalty, and frequent management changes, but their fundamentals continued to deteriorate, leading to investor losses.
Investors should combine company fundamentals, industry trends, and financial health to guard against risks hidden behind low P/E ratios.
High P/E ratios are often mistaken for overvaluation, but the reality is more complex.
The P/E ratio provides investors with a tool to initially assess stock valuation.Investors should combine industry characteristics, company growth potential, and other financial metrics when analyzing.Investors need to pay attention to market expectations for company growth while understanding financial health and growth potential.
The P/E ratio is influenced by market fluctuations, macroeconomic factors, and accounting standards, and the accuracy of financial statements is critical.Rational investment decisions require multidimensional analysis to avoid being misled by a single metric.
A negative P/E ratio indicates that the company is in a loss-making state.
Investors cannot use the P/E ratio to judge valuation in this case and should combine other financial metrics to analyze the company’s fundamentals.
A low P/E ratio does not necessarily mean a stock is cheap.
The company may face operational challenges or poor industry prospects.
Investors should combine profitability and industry conditions for a comprehensive judgment.
The trailing P/E is suitable for companies with stable earnings.
The forward P/E is suitable for growth-oriented companies.
P/E TTM is suitable for companies with significant seasonal fluctuations.
Investors should choose based on the company’s characteristics.
The P/E ratio reflects market expectations but cannot directly predict future stock prices.
Investors need to combine earnings growth, industry trends, and multidimensional analysis.
Banks have stable earnings but limited growth rates.
The market has conservative expectations for their future, leading to lower P/E ratios compared to high-growth industries like technology.
With a comprehensive VFV vs VOO comparison, you’re equipped to choose based on fees, liquidity, and taxes, but high cross-border fees, currency volatility, and offshore account complexities can hinder U.S. market allocations, especially for swift responses to earnings or swings. Imagine a platform with 0.5% remittance fees, same-day global transfers, and contract limit orders with zero fees, enabling seamless ETF trading via one account?
BiyaPay is tailored for S&P 500 investors, offering instant fiat-to-digital conversions to match market rhythms. With real-time exchange rate query, monitor USD trends and transfer at optimal moments to cut costs. Covering most regions with instant arrivals, it powers rapid allocations to S&P 500 ETFs (like VOO) or small-caps. Crucially, trade U.S. and Hong Kong markets through a single account, leveraging contract limit orders with zero fees for valuation-driven limit strategies.
Whether chasing long-term growth or diversifying risks, BiyaPay empowers your portfolio. Sign up now, visit stocks for U.S. prospects—quick setup unlocks cost-effective, data-driven trading. Join global investors and thrive in 2025 markets!
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.




 Australia
 Australia Austria
 Austria Belgium
 Belgium Canada
 Canada Cyprus
 Cyprus Czech Republic
 Czech Republic Denmark
 Denmark Estonia
 Estonia Finland
 Finland France
 France Germany
 Germany Greece
 Greece Hong Kong
 Hong Kong India
 India Indonesia
 Indonesia Ireland
 Ireland Italy
 Italy Japan
 Japan Latvia
 Latvia Lithuania
 Lithuania Luxembourg
 Luxembourg Malaysia
 Malaysia Malta
 Malta Morocco
 Morocco Nepal
 Nepal Netherlands
 Netherlands New Zealand
 New Zealand Norway
 Norway Pakistan
 Pakistan Philippines
 Philippines Poland
 Poland Portugal
 Portugal Romania
 Romania Singapore
 Singapore Slovakia
 Slovakia Slovenia
 Slovenia South Africa
 South Africa South Korea
 South Korea Spain
 Spain Sweden
 Sweden Thailand
 Thailand The United States
 The United States Turkey
 Turkey United Arab Emirates
 United Arab Emirates United Kingdom
 United Kingdom Vietnam
 Vietnam