
Image Source: pexels
E-commerce sellers often face multiple challenges when selecting cross-border remittance tools:
According to the 2023 China Cross-border Payment Industry Research Report, the factors most valued by e-commerce sellers include remittance speed, timeliness, and transaction size. Small, high-frequency transactions prefer third-party payment tools with instant receipt, while large transactions favor bank wire transfers. Fees, payment network coverage, and service stability are also key considerations.
When choosing remittance tools, e-commerce sellers must first clarify their business needs. Different business models and market positioning lead to significant variations in requirements for remittance tools. Fund receipt speed and exchange rate risk management are core concerns. For example, sellers in Southeast Asia may face shipment delays due to withdrawal delays, while export factories suffer profit losses from exchange rate fluctuations. Sellers operating on multiple platforms, such as Amazon or Temu, often deal with slow fund repatriation and currency fragmentation. Building a payment system that integrates collection channels and local clearing networks can achieve instant receipt, improving cash flow efficiency by approximately 30%.
E-commerce sellers typically focus on the following business needs:
- Multi-currency support to meet global transaction needs.
- Diverse payment methods, such as credit cards, debit cards, and bank transfers.
- Transaction security to ensure fund and information safety.
- Convenience to simplify collection and payment processes.
- Competitive exchange rates and low-cost services to reduce transaction costs.
- Risk management tools to minimize payment risks and disputes.
- Automated fund management to improve turnover efficiency.
- Transaction efficiency and receipt speed to ensure timely fund availability.
- Coverage of supported countries and regions for global operations.
- Platform stability and compliance to ensure smooth transactions.
Transaction scale directly influences the choice of remittance tools. Large transactions (over $10,000) typically use wire transfers (T/T) due to high security and suitability for large fund transfers. Medium transactions ($1,000 to $10,000) also often opt for wire transfers, balancing fees and security. Small payments (e.g., sample fees or test orders) favor convenient and fast tools like PayPal, Western Union, or MoneyGram. PayPal is the preferred choice for small cross-border payments due to its fund security, fast receipt, and global acceptance. Western Union and MoneyGram are suitable for small USD remittances, with simple operations, short receipt times, and high acceptance among European and American clients.
Fees are a core cost concern for e-commerce sellers. Fee structures vary significantly across remittance tools and banks. For example, major Hong Kong banks like ICBC, Bank of Communications, Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, and China Construction Bank charge a fee ratio of 0.10%, with a minimum of $20 and a maximum of $300. Additionally, telegraph fees are $80 per transaction in Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, and $150 elsewhere. Third-party platforms like World First, PingPong, etc. typically charge 1%-2.5%, with some offering fee exemptions for large transfers, though exchange rate losses should be noted. Western Union’s remittance fees are higher and usually borne by the buyer.
E-commerce sellers should evaluate actual costs by combining transaction amounts, exchange rate losses, and hidden fees.
Receipt speed directly affects cash flow efficiency. Bank counter remittances to the same bank account can achieve real-time receipt, while interbank transfers typically clear within a business day. Online banking and mobile banking enable 24-hour operations, with some interbank transfers supporting real-time receipt. Cross-border remittances involve multiple intermediaries, affecting receipt time and amount. Some channels offer low fees but slow receipt, while others provide fast receipt at higher costs.
Fund security and compliance are critical for e-commerce sellers. Sellers must identify and mitigate financial risks, such as fraudulent transactions, fund diversion, or illegal fund misuse. Choosing payment institutions with robust identity verification and risk management systems ensures efficient validation and strong system protection against cyberattacks and data breaches. Prioritize payment providers with international security certifications (e.g., PCI-DSS, ISO 27001) to demonstrate world-class security and compliance capabilities.
The partnership between banks and payment institutions is also crucial, with Hong Kong banks playing a key role in overseeing payment institution compliance. E-commerce sellers should reasonably configure overseas and Chinese accounts to enhance fund security and transaction efficiency.
User trust directly impacts the choice and continued use of remittance tools. Data shows that approximately 21% of consumers experience unpleasant cross-border transactions, with negative experiences rising to 31% for cross-border remittance users. Fraud risk is a major reason consumers abandon certain payment methods, with about two-thirds stopping use due to fraud concerns. Trust sensitivity varies by age group, with 76% of Gen Z and 71% of Millennials interrupting transactions due to suspected fraud. A VISA survey indicates that security (63%), trust (51%), and reliability (49%) are the top three factors in choosing cross-border payment methods.
E-commerce sellers should prioritize remittance tools with high market recognition and user trust, focusing on platform safety guidelines and user feedback to enhance customer experience and repurchase rates.

Image Source: pexels
Bank wire transfers are commonly used for traditional B2B large-scale trade. For Hong Kong banks, fees are approximately 3%, with receipt times of 2-3 days. Wire transfers offer high security but are less suitable for small, high-frequency cross-border e-commerce transactions due to fees and timeliness. Data shows that bank wire transfers are less frequently used in cross-border e-commerce, mainly for large fund transfers.
| Payment Method | Applicable Scenarios | Fee Ratio | Receipt Time | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank Wire Transfer | Traditional B2B large-scale trade | ~3% | 2-3 days | High security, low timeliness, high fees |
| Third-party Payment | Small, high-frequency cross-border e-commerce transactions | 0-1% | Instant | Low fees, fast receipt, suitable for e-commerce |
Third-party payment tools like PayPal, Stripe, and Wise are ideal for small, high-frequency transactions. PayPal offers fast receipt with fees typically at 0-1%. Wise is known for low exchange rate losses and transparent fees, suitable for multi-currency settlements. Stripe supports credit card payments, convenient for global customers. Third-party tools offer high fund security, ease of operation, and wide application in cross-border e-commerce collections.
Global payment solutions like Airwallex and WorldFirst rely on proprietary forex systems and intelligent routing, supporting multi-currency accounts and instant receipt. Airwallex, through partnerships with clearing organizations, reduces costs with fees of approximately 0.5%-1%. WorldFirst focuses on B2B collections, supporting VAT payments, suitable for inter-business cross-border settlements. Both support multi-platform and multi-account management, enhancing cash flow efficiency.
Localized payment tools are widely used in different countries and regions. In Southeast Asia, tools like Thailand’s TrueMoney, LinePay, Vietnam’s MoMo, and Malaysia’s Touch’n Go eWallet are mainstream e-wallets. In Latin America, Pix, OXXO are common, while Africa relies on mobile money. Enterprises integrating multiple local tools via aggregated payment services improve payment success rates and user experience.
Virtual accounts simplify cross-border payment processes. Merchants can receive multi-currency payments quickly without opening actual bank accounts in each country. Virtual accounts reduce forex exchange risks, improve settlement efficiency, and lower fees. Multi-currency accounts support flexible fund management, accelerate cash flow, and reduce operational costs, suitable for multi-market e-commerce sellers.
Platform-integrated payments, such as those on Amazon or eBay, often collaborate with tools like Payoneer. Sellers can open multi-currency sub-accounts for separate fund management. Platforms support one-click payments for advertising and bills, improving operational efficiency. eBay’s managed payment service allows funds to flow directly into Payoneer accounts, simplifying withdrawals, reducing costs, and optimizing the overall experience.

Image Source: unsplash
Bank wire transfers are suitable for large fund transfers. For Hong Kong banks, fee structures are transparent, typically 0.1% of the remittance amount, with a minimum of $20 and a maximum of $500. Wire transfers have relatively fast receipt, typically 1-2 business days for cross-border transactions. Funds are highly secure and trackable.
| Aspect | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Fees | Transparent fee structure | High fees, including multiple charges |
| Receipt Speed | 1-2 days, relatively fast | Cross-border delays due to intermediary banks |
| Security | Multiple bank options, high security | Irreversible once sent, requires cautious operation |
Bank wire transfers are hard to recover if errors occur, and cross-border transactions may face tracking difficulties due to intermediary banks.
Third-party payment platforms like PayPal and Wise have strict regulatory qualifications, using multi-factor authentication and encryption to ensure fund security. They offer strong compliance, real-time anomaly detection, and risk prevention.
Global payment solutions like Airwallex and WorldFirst support multi-currency accounts, real-time exchange rate updates, and simplified cross-border settlement. Enterprises can customize account management to improve financial efficiency.
These solutions use intelligent algorithms to connect with global payment systems, automate settlements, reduce exchange rate fluctuation risks, optimize payment paths, and lower fees.
Localized payment tools meet regional user habits, improving payment success rates. Enterprises integrating multiple local methods via aggregated payments enhance user experience.
Virtual accounts offer high flexibility in fund management, enabling centralized allocation and transfer of funds.
Platform payment tools, such as aggregated payments, support multiple platforms and terminals, with unified interfaces simplifying merchant management.
Small-scale retail e-commerce sellers typically target global consumers with low transaction amounts and high frequency. When choosing remittance tools, prioritize:
Small-scale retail sellers should opt for third-party payment tools like PayPal, Wise, and Stripe, combined with virtual accounts and global payment solutions, to significantly reduce per-transaction costs and address multi-currency needs flexibly.
Recommendation: For high-frequency small transactions, prioritize PayPal or Wise with virtual accounts to enhance fund management efficiency. For emerging markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, integrate localized payment tools to improve payment success rates.
Large-scale wholesale e-commerce sellers deal with high transaction amounts and lower frequency, with higher demands for fund security and receipt speed. Bank wire transfers remain the mainstream choice, especially for transactions exceeding $10,000. Hong Kong bank wire transfers have clear fee structures, high fund security, and receipt times of 1-2 business days. Wholesale sellers can combine global payment solutions (e.g., WorldFirst, Airwallex) for multi-currency management to reduce exchange rate fluctuation risks. For long-term clients, locking exchange rates and batch settlements can optimize costs.
Tip: For large-scale wholesale, prioritize bank wire transfers combined with global payment solutions for centralized fund management. For key markets like Europe and Southeast Asia, flexibly switch payment methods based on client needs to enhance satisfaction.
Cross-border multi-market e-commerce sellers operate in multiple countries and regions, needing to address diverse currencies, payment habits, and regulatory requirements. Combining multiple remittance tools optimizes overall fund flow management. The table below compares common tools:
| Remittance Tool | Fee Features | Pros | Cons | Applicable Scenarios |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stripe | US: 2.9% + $0.3, non-US USD payments +1%, Hong Kong sellers: 3.4% + HK$2.35, Alipay/WeChat Pay: 2.2% + HK$2 | Low fees, no withdrawal fees, easy integration, high security, supports multiple credit cards and e-wallets | Slow fund receipt (~7 business days), mandatory USD-to-HKD conversion may incur exchange losses, requires Hong Kong account | Suitable for independent website sellers, especially in the US, meeting credit card payment needs |
| PingPong | 1% withdrawal fee, no hidden fees, no annual fee | Low and transparent fees, fast withdrawals (same-day for private accounts in mainland China, 1-2 days for corporate), supports multiple platforms and currencies | Longer receipt times (3-6 business days) | Suitable for Chinese sellers, fast RMB withdrawals, supports major e-commerce platforms |
| PayPal | Transaction fees 2%-3.4%, withdrawal fees apply (China: $35/transfer, Hong Kong: free) | Wide global coverage, high security for buyers and sellers, supports multiple payment methods, easy integration | High fees, high withdrawal costs, strict seller reviews | Suitable for global buyers, meeting diverse payment habits |
Combining Stripe and PayPal allows sellers to meet diverse consumer payment habits, while PingPong accelerates withdrawals and reduces fees, optimizing overall fund flow management.
Recommendation: Cross-border multi-market sellers should combine Stripe, PayPal, and PingPong based on target market payment preferences to enhance cash flow and customer experience.
Region-focused e-commerce sellers target specific countries or regions, requiring a strong focus on localized payment needs and compliance. When choosing remittance tools, consider these localized factors:
Region-focused sellers should prioritize localized payment tools combined with third-party platforms to improve payment success rates and fund security.
Tip: For emerging markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, partner with mainstream local payment providers and combine overseas warehouse layouts to enhance overall operational efficiency.
Multi-platform e-commerce sellers manage multiple sales channels, facing challenges like account integration, fund consolidation, and compliance risks. Common issues include:
Multi-platform sellers should adopt platform-integrated payments (e.g., Payoneer), global payment solutions (e.g., Airwallex), and virtual accounts to manage multi-platform fund flows uniformly. API interfaces enable automated reconciliation and multi-currency settlements, improving operational efficiency.
Recommendation: Multi-platform sellers should prioritize tools supporting multiple platforms and currencies, combined with automated fund management systems, to reduce manual risks and enhance cash flow and security.
E-commerce sellers should systematically evaluate remittance tools from multiple dimensions. First, select collection channels compatible with operational platforms and target markets, such as Payoneer or WorldFirst for Amazon stores. Second, compare fees and hidden costs, focusing on withdrawal fees, monthly fees, and other expenses. Receipt speed directly impacts cash flow, so prioritize platforms with fast or real-time settlements. In practice, sellers can test services to evaluate platform stability and response speed.
Sellers should also focus on payment success rates, compliance qualifications, and risk control capabilities. A tool’s compliance and risk control determine fund security. Considering store scale, target markets, and cost budgets helps select the most suitable remittance tool.
During cross-border remittances, sellers face various risks. Common issues include errors in recipient information, leading to held or frozen funds. Some payment methods, like PayPal, are convenient but have high fees and fund recovery risks. Credit risks, such as consumer fraud and payment failures, also affect fund recovery.
Tax compliance is a critical aspect for cross-border e-commerce sellers. Sellers can ensure compliance through:
Sellers should select settlement methods based on business scale and market needs to ensure compliant and efficient fund flows, avoiding tax risks.
E-commerce sellers should focus on business needs and market changes when selecting remittance tools. There is no one-size-fits-all solution, only the most suitable combination. Regularly evaluate tool performance and adjust remittance strategies flexibly. Industry policies and new tools evolve constantly, so staying proactive is crucial.
Tip: Avoid focusing solely on fees while neglecting receipt speed and fund security. Comprehensive consideration ensures stable business growth.
Sellers can check if the payment institution holds relevant financial licenses. Hong Kong banks and major third-party platforms typically have international compliance certifications, ensuring fund security.
Sellers should contact the payment platform’s customer service immediately, providing transaction evidence. Hong Kong banks and major payment institutions generally assist with verification to unfreeze accounts quickly.
Sellers can choose global payment solutions with real-time exchange rate locking. Platforms like Airwallex and WorldFirst offer multi-currency accounts to minimize conversion losses.
Third-party tools like PayPal and Wise offer fast receipt and low fees, ideal for small, high-frequency transactions. Combining virtual accounts enhances fund management efficiency.
Sellers should prioritize platforms with PCI-DSS and ISO 27001 certifications. Regularly updating passwords and enabling two-factor authentication further enhance fund security.
This article provides a detailed guide for e-commerce sellers on how to choose the most suitable remittance tool for 2025. It offers an in-depth analysis across various dimensions, including business needs, transaction size, fees, transfer speed, security and compliance, and user trust. Based on different seller types (e.g., small-scale retail, large-scale wholesale, multi-market cross-border, and regionally focused), the article provides specific selection recommendations and practical guidance. The article emphasizes that there is no single best solution, but rather the most suitable combination, and advises sellers to holistically consider all factors and stay sensitive to new industry tools and policies.
However, despite the detailed content of the article, a core challenge for many Chinese investors remains: the flow of cross-border funds. Traditional funding methods, such as international bank wire transfers, are not only complex and time-consuming but also come with high fees and opaque exchange rate spreads. These issues can directly impact investment returns and increase transaction costs.
BiyaPay was created to solve these cross-border financial pain points. We offer a smoother, more cost-effective channel for your investments. We support the conversion between various fiat and digital currencies, allowing you to easily manage global assets, and provide a real-time exchange rate query feature to ensure you always get the best rates. What’s more, our remittance fees are as low as 0.5% with same-day delivery, significantly cutting down your transaction costs and time. Now, you don’t need a complex overseas account to invest in both U.S. and Hong Kong stocks on one platform. Say goodbye to the hassle of cross-border payments and start your efficient financial journey. Register with BiyaPay today to make fund management as smooth as trading.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.



