
Image Source: pexels
Conducting stablecoin USDT international transfers, the current optimal solution is through large exchanges like Binance, selecting low-cost networks such as TRC20, BEP20, or Solana. This method far surpasses traditional bank channels in cost and efficiency.
Traditional wire transfers usually require 3-5 business days to process, with a single fee reaching 15 to 30 USD. In contrast, USDT transfers cost less than $1 and arrive within minutes.
USDT, as the leading stablecoin by market cap, has enormous trading volume ensuring excellent liquidity, making it a reliable choice for international payments.
| Metric | Value | 
|---|---|
| Market Cap | $183.36 billion | 
| 24-Hour Trading Volume | $145.16 billion | 

Image Source: pexels
To understand how to achieve the lowest cost transfers, you first need to clarify the sources of fees. The total cost of USDT transfers mainly consists of two parts: network fees and exchange withdrawal fees.
Network fees, usually called “Gas fees”, are fees users must pay to execute any operation on the blockchain. This fee is directly paid to the network’s validators (i.e., “miners”) to reward them for processing and verifying your transaction.
Gas fees are not fixed; they depend on the blockchain network you choose. Different networks have vastly different processing efficiencies and fees. Choosing a low-cost network is the first step to saving fees.
Core Tip: Gas fees are charged by the blockchain network, not the wallet or exchange. Even decentralized wallets like MetaMask must pay the corresponding network’s Gas fee when transferring.
The following is a comparison of mainstream public chain USDT transfer fees and speeds:
| Network | Approximate Fee (USD) | Estimated Time | 
|---|---|---|
| Solana (SOL) | ~$0.0005 | Less than 1 minute | 
| BNB Chain (BEP20) | ~$0.0033 | 1-2 minutes | 
| TRON (TRC20) | ~$1.9 - $3.97 | Less than 1 minute | 
| Ethereum (ERC20) | ~$0.0443 | 5-10 minutes (longer during congestion) | 
As seen above, Solana and BNB Chain (BEP20) provide extremely low-cost and lightning-fast transfer experiences.
Exchange withdrawal fees are a fixed fee charged by centralized exchanges (CEX) as service providers. This fee is independent of network Gas fees and covers the platform’s costs for maintaining its wallet system and processing withdrawals.
Important Distinction: Network Gas fees are paid to blockchain validators and fluctuate. Exchange withdrawal fees are paid to the exchange platform and are usually fixed.
Different exchanges have different withdrawal fees for the same network. Therefore, choosing an exchange with low withdrawal fees is crucial.
| Exchange | Network | Withdrawal Fee (USD) | 
|---|---|---|
| Biyapay | TRC20 | 1 USD | 
| Binance | TRC20 / BEP20 / SOL | 1 USD | 
| OKX | TRC20 / BEP20 / SOL | 1 USD | 
| Bybit | TRC20 / BEP20 / SOL | 1 USD | 
Overall, total transfer cost = Network fee (Gas Fee) + Exchange withdrawal fee. To achieve the lowest cost, users need to choose both a low Gas fee network and a low withdrawal fee exchange.

Image Source: pexels
After understanding the fee structure, the next step is to choose the most suitable transfer path for yourself. The user’s fund starting point (in an exchange or personal wallet) and endpoint determine the transfer path, with significant differences in cost and operational complexity among paths. The following is a detailed comparison of three mainstream paths.
This is currently the most cost-effective and simplest path for stablecoin USDT international transfers, especially suitable for most users. When a user’s USDT is stored in a centralized exchange (CEX), such as Binance, and they want to transfer it to another exchange, such as OKX or Biyapay, this path is the top choice.
Core Advantages:
Many exchanges also provide internal transfer functions. If both parties are on the same platform (for example, both Binance users), transfers are usually free and instant because they do not go through the blockchain but are internal ledger settlements on the platform.
| Feature | On-Chain Transaction (CEX to Another CEX) | Off-Chain Transaction (Same CEX Internal Transfer) | 
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Fixed withdrawal fee (e.g., 1 USD) | Free | 
| Speed | Minute-level | Instant | 
| Example | Transfer from Binance to OKX | Binance users transfer via Pay ID | 
| Note | Fees affected by platform policy but relatively stable | Binance internal transfers free and instant | 
Operation Process Example: Transfer USDT from Binance to OKX
Security Tip: Before any stablecoin USDT international transfer, it is strongly recommended to test with a small amount of funds (such as 1-2 USDT) first to ensure the address and network selection are correct. Once wrong, funds may be permanently lost.
This path is suitable for users whose funds are stored in decentralized wallets (such as MetaMask, Trust Wallet) and want to transfer them to a centralized exchange (such as Binance, Biyapay) for trading or withdrawal.
A common misconception is that transferring with MetaMask is “free” because it does not charge service fees. However, users need to directly bear the blockchain network’s Gas fee, which is entirely determined by network conditions and can be very cheap or extremely expensive.
Historically, the Ethereum network experienced extreme congestion due to popular apps like CryptoKitties, causing single transfer Gas fees to soar to tens or even hundreds of USD, making small stablecoin USDT international transfers completely unprofitable.
Core Risks:
Therefore, this path is more suitable for users with some blockchain operation knowledge who can grasp low fee rate timings.
This path is suitable for users who want to hold assets long-term or need to use DeFi applications, thus transferring USDT from an exchange to their own controlled decentralized wallet.
The core of this path is transfer of asset ownership.
“Not your keys, not your coins.” This famous saying precisely describes the fundamental difference between exchanges and personal wallets. When funds are stored in an exchange, users technically only have an account balance, with private keys managed by the platform. After transferring assets to a personal wallet, users truly fully own and control these assets.
This full control also brings full responsibility.
| Aspect | CEX Wallet (Custodial) | Personal Wallet (Non-Custodial) | 
|---|---|---|
| Private Key Control | Managed by the exchange | Held and managed by the user | 
| Security Responsibility | Exchange responsible for platform security | User fully responsible for protecting private keys | 
| Asset Recovery | Can recover via customer service password reset | Loss of private key/mnemonic means permanent asset loss | 
| User Autonomy | Limited, need to trust the platform | Complete autonomy and privacy | 
Cost Structure: Similar to Path One, users need to pay the fixed withdrawal fee charged by the exchange. For example, withdrawing USDT from Binance to a MetaMask wallet, choosing the BEP20 network, the fee is usually a fixed 1 USD.
This path is suitable for experienced users pursuing asset autonomy and capable of securely managing private keys.
Summary Comparison of Three Paths
| Path | Total Cost (Network Fee + Withdrawal Fee) | Estimated Time | Operational Complexity | Applicable Scenarios | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. CEX → CEX | Extremely low (fixed withdrawal fee, about 1 USD) | Fast (1-5 minutes) | Low | Recommended! The most mainstream international transfer method. | 
| 2. Wallet → CEX | Uncertain (real-time Gas fee, high volatility) | Uncertain (depends on network congestion) | Medium | Need to manage Gas fees yourself, suitable for experienced users. | 
| 3. CEX → Wallet | Low (fixed withdrawal fee, about 1 USD) | Fast (1-5 minutes) | High | Pursue full asset control, need to manage private keys yourself. | 
Theoretical knowledge needs practice to consolidate. This section provides a detailed operation guide to help users safely and low-cost complete USDT transfers.
Here, taking the most recommended path “Transfer USDT from Binance App via TRC20 network to another exchange account” as an example, specific operation steps are shown.
TRC20 addresses usually start with a capital letter “T”, for example
TGa9…h91x. Please verify carefully.
Blockchain transfers are irreversible. Once wrong, funds may be permanently lost. Therefore, be sure to follow the following security rules.
For most users, the best practice for stablecoin USDT international transfers in 2025 is clear. Users should utilize large exchanges like Binance and choose low-cost networks like TRC20, BEP20, or Solana. These networks provide fees below $1 and minute-level speeds. Users should flexibly choose the most suitable transfer path based on the final recipient (exchange or personal wallet) and their own operational proficiency, referring to the comparison table in the article.
Looking ahead, the maturity of Layer 2 networks like Arbitrum and Optimism will provide more ultra-low-cost options. They process multiple transactions in batches, expected to further reduce transfer fees and improve efficiency.
Blockchain transfers are irreversible. Once funds are sent to the wrong address or mismatched network, they usually cannot be recovered. Users must carefully verify all information before transferring and conduct small amount tests.
Transfer delays are usually caused by network congestion, leading to slower transaction confirmations. Users can query real-time status through a blockchain explorer.
Operation Tip: Enter the transaction hash (TxID) in the blockchain explorer to view transfer progress.
USDT is a token built on other public chains. When transferring, users need to use the public chain’s native token to pay network fees (Gas Fee). For example:
No. TRC20 is highly recommended for its low fees and high speed. But BEP20 and Solana networks also provide highly competitive low-cost solutions. Users should ensure the recipient supports the selected network.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.



