
Image Source: pexels
For Chinese enterprises seeking globalization, the cross-border payment system is like the “vascular system” of their business empire, and its compliance directly determines business security. With the rapid expansion of market size, enterprises generally face complex cross-border payment legal issues.
| Indicator | Value (USD) | 
|---|---|
| 2023 China cross-border e-commerce market size | Over 2.6 trillion USD | 
| 2024 global cross-border payment market size forecast | 212.55 billion USD | 
| 2025 global cross-border payment market size forecast | 227.63 billion USD | 
In this rapidly growing market, enterprises must address four core challenges: strict foreign exchange controls, global anti-money laundering (AML) scrutiny, multinational tax regulations, and cross-border data security.

Image Source: pexels
The free flow of funds is the lifeblood of global business expansion. However, for Chinese enterprises going overseas, foreign exchange controls build an “invisible wall,” becoming the primary compliance challenge they must overcome.
Mainland China implements a strict capital account foreign exchange management system. Large outbound fund transfers by enterprises, especially those involving capital accounts, usually require approval from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE). Specific restrictions include:
This wall exists not only at the outbound end. When funds enter major markets such as Europe and the US, enterprises also face strict regulatory scrutiny. For example, the EU requires member states to mandatorily screen foreign direct investment (FDI) in specific sectors, with particular attention to investor backgrounds and their connections to foreign governments. These complex cross-border payment legal issues lead to blocked fund flows, difficulties in foreign exchange settlement, and increased exchange rate risks in operations.
Faced with strict controls, enterprises are not helpless. Proactively adopting compliant payment tools and strategies is key to crossing this “invisible wall.”
Core Strategy: Prioritize compliance, use professional tools to simplify processes, and turn risks into competitive advantages.
Enterprises can adopt the following three efficient solutions:
By comprehensively using these tools, enterprises can make complex fund management processes clear and controllable, paving the way for the smooth development of global business.

Image Source: pexels
If foreign exchange controls are the “gate” for fund flows, then anti-money laundering (AML) and “Know Your Customer” (KYC) rules are the “security inspection system” of the global financial system. For Chinese enterprises going overseas, ignoring these rules may lead to consequences more severe than fund freezes.
Global regulatory bodies are cracking down on money laundering and terrorist financing with unprecedented intensity. AML requires financial institutions to monitor and report suspicious transactions, while KYC requires institutions to verify customer identities before establishing business relationships. The challenge for Chinese enterprises lies in the differences in regulatory standards across countries and regions, which increases compliance complexity.
Any negligence in the process can trigger severe penalties. Account freezes and business interruptions are just the beginning; huge fines are commonplace.
Warning: The cost of non-compliance far exceeds imagination. Enterprises may face fines of up to millions of dollars for a single violation.
| Regulation Name | Maximum Civil Fine | 
|---|---|
| US Patriot Act | 1 million USD or twice the transaction amount | 
| EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive | Minimum 5 million euros | 
These stringent regulations are cross-border payment legal issues that all overseas enterprises must take seriously.
Faced with increasingly complex scrutiny, relying on manual processes is insufficient. Enterprises must turn to technology to build an automated and intelligent risk control and compliance review system.
Utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies is currently the most effective strategy. AI-driven systems can efficiently process and analyze massive data, achieving precision unattainable by traditional methods.
Many advanced payment platforms have integrated such functions. For example, service providers like Biyapay use their built-in intelligent risk control engines to help enterprises automate most KYC and AML compliance processes, allowing enterprises to focus more on core business growth. By adopting this risk-based intelligent approach, enterprises can transform compliance from a passive burden into a core capability to ensure global business security.
When enterprises successfully handle fund flows and AML scrutiny, a more complex maze—multinational tax systems—appears before them. Tax compliance is not only part of operating costs but also key to determining whether enterprises can legally operate in overseas markets.
Tax laws vary greatly across countries and regions, especially between the two mainstream consumption tax systems—the EU’s value-added tax (VAT) and the US sales tax. Enterprises must understand and comply with vastly different rules, or face serious legal and financial risks.
Core Differences: EU VAT is levied at every stage of the supply chain, while US sales tax is levied only at the final point of sale. This fundamental difference leads to entirely different compliance requirements.
| Feature | EU Value-Added Tax (VAT) | US Sales Tax | 
|---|---|---|
| Levy Stage | Every stage of the supply chain | Only at the final point of sale | 
| Tax Rate Structure | A few uniform national rates | Thousands of different rates by state and locality | 
| Tax Recovery | Enterprises can deduct input tax | No input tax deduction mechanism | 
| Management Level | National level | State and local level | 
This complexity often traps enterprises:
Manually managing complex global taxes is nearly impossible. Enterprises need to combine automation tools and professional tax planning to navigate the maze.
First, adopting automated tax compliance software is an efficient first step. Tools like Avalara and TaxJar can seamlessly integrate with e-commerce platforms and ERP systems to achieve the following functions:
Second, technical tools must be combined with professional tax planning. This includes formulating reasonable transfer pricing strategies to ensure transactions between related companies comply with the arm’s length principle and preparing master files and local files to cope with tax audits. At the same time, making good use of double taxation agreements (DTAs) signed by China with over 100 countries can effectively reduce withholding taxes on dividends, interest, etc., and optimize global profit allocation. Treating tax compliance as part of strategic planning is the fundamental way to solve this cross-border payment legal issue.
In the digital age, data is the core asset of enterprises but also brings huge compliance responsibilities. Payment information involves users’ most sensitive privacy, and improper handling can lead to dual blows to reputation and finances.
Global data regulation is becoming increasingly strict. Overseas enterprises must simultaneously address multiple regulations such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the US California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and China’s Data Security Law. These regulations set clear requirements for the processing and cross-border transmission of payment information, such as the data minimization principle, meaning enterprises can only collect data necessary for completing transactions.
Core Challenge: Enterprises need to find a balance between meeting regulatory transparency requirements and protecting user data privacy. This “dual test” requires enterprises to establish rigorous data processing processes.
GDPR grants users extensive rights, and enterprises must respond to user requests within specified time limits.
| User Right | Application in Payment Data | Response Time Limit | 
|---|---|---|
| Right of Access | Customers can request a copy of their payment transaction records. | 30 days | 
| Right to Erasure | Within legally permitted scope, customers can request deletion of their payment data. | 30 days | 
| Data Portability | Customers can transfer their payment history to other service providers. | 30 days | 
Any negligence can lead to fines of up to millions of dollars, making data security a cross-border payment legal issue that cannot be ignored.
Faced with complex data regulations, enterprises should actively adopt compliance technologies and establish sound data governance mechanisms.
First, applying tokenization technology is an effective means to protect payment data.
Second, choosing partners that meet industry standards is crucial. Enterprises should ensure that their cooperating payment service providers have passed the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI-DSS) certification. PCI-DSS sets strict technical and operational requirements for all entities handling payment data. Service providers like Biyapay not only comply with PCI-DSS standards but also have built-in security technologies such as tokenization, helping enterprises easily meet compliance requirements.
Finally, enterprises need to establish internal data governance mechanisms, clearly defining data classification, access permissions, and storage cycles, and conduct regular security audits to ensure all operations are traceable.
Chinese enterprises going overseas must navigate the complex network of foreign exchange controls, anti-money laundering, multinational taxation, and data security. Cross-border payment compliance is the lifeline of their globalization strategy, by no means a simple cost expenditure.
Enterprises should regard compliance as a strategic investment to build global trust and core competitiveness.
Looking ahead, enterprises need to establish a “dynamic compliance” concept. The Asia-Pacific compliance technology (RegTech) market is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate of over 24.70% from 2025 to 2030. Embracing such technologies and choosing excellent partners is the cornerstone of building a solid global business.
Small enterprises should first focus on the compliance of payment channels. Choosing licensed and reputable payment service providers is crucial. These providers can help enterprises handle basic AML reviews and fund inflow/outflow declarations, laying a secure foundation for future development.
Enterprises do not need to develop it themselves. Many professional payment platforms have built-in intelligent risk control engines that can automate most KYC and AML compliance processes. Enterprises should choose such service providers and outsource complex compliance work to professional institutions.
Tax registration obligations are usually triggered by “economic nexus.” This includes sales exceeding specific thresholds or having inventory locally (such as using overseas warehouses). Enterprises should use automation tools to monitor these indicators and immediately consult professional tax advisors when standards are met.
PCI-DSS is a globally recognized payment data security standard. Choosing partners compliant with this standard means the enterprise’s payment processes meet strict security requirements. This can effectively protect customer data, reduce data breach risks, and potential huge fines.
*This article is provided for general information purposes and does not constitute legal, tax or other professional advice from BiyaPay or its subsidiaries and its affiliates, and it is not intended as a substitute for obtaining advice from a financial advisor or any other professional.
We make no representations, warranties or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the contents of this publication.



